[ad_1]
American citizens have a tendency to love investments that toughen their native economies, so participants of Congress have a tendency to place numerous effort into directing as many federal finances as conceivable to their states and districts. The difficulty comes when Republicans rejoice — and too regularly, take credit score for — investments they voted towards.
The standard reaction from GOP lawmakers stuck up in hypocrisy controversies is unassuming: They argue that they could’ve adversarial the regulation, but when the government goes to make the investments anyway, those participants determine they could as smartly make the case for steering a few of the ones finances to their very own constituents.
That is a fallacious protection, but it surely’s a minimum of coherent. Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar, however, confronted comparable questions, and as The New Republic famous, the Florida Republican struggled in strangely cringeworthy tactics.
Florida Consultant Maria Salazar stated she doesn’t bear in mind balloting towards two key items of regulation—although she’s often claimed credit score for his or her successes in her congressional district. In an interview on CBS Information Miami, Salazar aggressively skirted direct questions on her balloting document at the CHIPS and Science Act and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, at one level telling the host that she had to talk to her team of workers to remind her of her balloting document in Washington, D.C.
Jim DeFede, an investigative reporter on the CBS associate in Miami, famous a up to date match within the house at which Salazar offered a take a look at for $650,000 to lend a hand small companies at Florida Global College.
“You voted against the bill that gave the money that you then signed a check for and handed and had a photo op,” DeFede defined to the congresswoman.
Salazar claimed now not to bear in mind how she voted at the regulation.